Articles on Litigation - Securities
Oct 25, 2016 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert, online exclusive
WHEN A PROPOSED MERGER between Canadian online gambling company Amaya Inc. and UK betting giant William Hill fell apart last week, larger questions were raised about the sale or merger prospects of any company whose former senior management has been accused of securities violations. Whether it ...
Oct 03, 2014 | by Julius Melnitzer | from Lexpert Magazine October 2014 Issue
US appeal court clarifies definition under anti-corruption laws but fails to provide a “bright line” test Until relatively recently, neither Canadian nor US courts have shed much light on what constitutes a “foreign official” under the countries' respective ...
Nov 29, 2013 | by Brian Burton | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
Standard directors' and officers' insurance may not be enough if the unthinkable happens It’s natural for first-time corporate directors to be flattered when a major company comes courting their services. They should rather be wary, bordering on suspicious, experienced ...
Nov 29, 2013 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
Litigators are raising concern over increased cross-border cooperation powers for regulators A recent amendment to the Ontario securities regime that allows the province’s regulator to quietly disclose information across borders is a troubling development in Canadian securities enforcement, ...
Nov 28, 2014 | by Sheldon Gordon | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
In its January 2014 decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin , the Supreme Court of Canada provided what it hoped would be a road map for faster, less costly, more streamlined adjudication of civil actions through greater use of summary proceedings. While some commentators have lauded the ruling as ...
Nov 28, 2014 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
The Ontario Securities Commission’s decision to open the door to no-contest settlements means officers and directors of publicly listed companies accused of securities violations may be able to cut a deal with regulators without admitting they did anything wrong. The move is popular with ...
Nov 27, 2015 | by Paul McLaughlin | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
Canada is slowly shedding its image of being soft on fraud and white-collar crime There has been a longstanding perception that Canada is soft on fraud and white-collar crime, both domestically and internationally. A number of recent government initiatives, however, suggest that may no longer be ...
Nov 25, 2016 | by Sheldon Gordon | from Lexpert Special Edition – Litigation
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS, ideally, are worthy alternatives to the courts because of the subject expertise and procedural efficiency they provide. Increasingly, however, tribunals have themselves become bogged down in a torrent of documents and motions. Some have recently launched initiatives ...
May 13, 2015 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert Magazine June 2015 Issue
Ordinarily news that a Toronto-area man settled with the Ontario Securities Commission for acting on a tip that returned a 635-per-cent profit would seem unexceptional. Except Anand Hariharan is not involved with a reporting issuer in Ontario, and he is not a financial adviser. He is an aircraft ...
May 02, 2017 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2017 Canadian Lexpert Directory
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in AIC Limited v. Fischer is best known for the proposition that plaintiffs who have received settlements in regulatory proceedings (in this case, Ontario Securities Commission proceedings) are not necessarily precluded from bringing class actions ...
Jun 21, 2016 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2016 Canadian Lexpert Directory
COMPLICATING SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in AIC Limited v. Fischer is best known for the proposition that plaintiffs who have received settlements in regulatory proceedings (in this case, Ontario Securities Commission proceedings) are not necessarily ...
Jul 25, 2017 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert online exclusive
The Ontario Securities Commission, in its reasons for the recent Eco Oro decision, chastises the Toronto Stock Exchange for approving a private placement that uses questionable tactics meant to block a proxy challenge. Boards of listed companies that find themselves the objects of unwelcome ...
Jan 27, 2016 | from Lexpert Magazine January 2016 Issue
A pair of decisions on shareholder rights plans by two securities regulators have cast light on how so-called “poison pills” will be dealt with in the lead-up to the Canadian Securities Administrators’ newly proposed takeover bid regime. The late November decision by the Alberta ...
Jan 11, 2016 | by Julius Melnitzer | from Lexpert Magazine January 2016 Issue
In a less than stellar year for business, only the decisions relating to privilege, certification and leave can be seen as decidedly positive in our Top Ten Cases of 2015 list. Canada’s courts delivered body blows to several other issues It was decidedly not a banner year for business in ...
Jan 06, 2015 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2015 Lexpert/ALM 500 Directory
ONTARIO TO AMEND LIMITATION FOR STATUTORY SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS In September 2014, the Ontario government announced that it would amend the provisions governing the existing three-year limitation period for obtaining leave to proceed with statutory securities class actions. Currently, the ...
Feb 24, 2016 | by Julius Melnitzer | from Lexpert Magazine February 2016 Issue
Plaintiffs seeking leave to file secondary-market securities class actions in Canada will face a steeper incline than they have in the past. For this, they can thank the Supreme Court of Canada’s December decisions in a trilogy of securities class action cases: CIBC v. Green, Silver v. IMAX ...
Feb 13, 2017 | by Julius Melnitzer | from Lexpert Magazine January/February 2017 Issue
After the disappointing jurisprudential results experienced by Canadian business in 2015, the landscape more than evened out this past year — which is not to say that Canadian appellate courts ignored anti-business arguments: while five of our top 10 business decisions can be regarded as ...
Dec 18, 2014 | by Julius Melnitzer | from Lexpert Magazine Nov/Dec 2014 Issue
Courts in both the US and Canada seem intent on ensuring that their jurisdictions do not become havens for North American securities class actions. In August, the Second Circuit expanded the restrictions surrounding “foreign-cubed” securities lawsuits where foreign purchasers of ...
Dec 11, 2014 | by Ahmad Hathout | from Lexpert Magazine January 2015 Issue
A recent memorandum of understanding between the federal Competition Bureau and the Ontario Securities Commission signals a trend towards increased information-sharing between regulators, although the enhanced cooperative effort will not necessarily lead to joint investigations. The distinction ...
Dec 07, 2017 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2018 Lexpert/ALM 500 Directory
COMPLICATING SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS According to the Bennett Jones Class Action Litigation Group: “In 2016, significant decisions were rendered in class proceedings that provide clarity on how Canadian courts intend to interact with each other, domestic and foreign litigants, and courts ...
Dec 06, 2016 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2017 Lexpert/ALM 500 Directory
Complicating Securities Class Actions The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in AIC Limited v. Fischer is best known for the proposition that plaintiffs who have received settlements in regulatory proceedings (in this case, Ontario Securities Commission proceedings) are not necessarily ...
Dec 03, 2014 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert US/Canada Cross-Border Guide – Litigation
It may surprise some people to learn just how closely the battle between US District Court Judge Jed S. Rakoff and the US Securities and Exchange Commission over the no-contest settlement with Citigroup Global Markets was followed by Canada’s most influential market regulator. But when it ...
Dec 02, 2013 | by Sandra Rubin | from Lexpert US/Canada Cross-Border Guide – Litigation
Securities class actions, which often have cross-border elements, are facing threats on a number of fronts in Canada Sinking share prices are leading shareholders on both sides of the border to launch proxy battles. But these days, in Canada, it is quite likely to be a US shareholder in the thick ...
Dec 02, 2013 | by Brian Burton | from Lexpert US/Canada Cross-Border Guide – Litigation
Laws on director liability and foreign corruption are converging toward a common standard as business operations become more globalized, but there are still key differences in the law between Canada and the US Most corporate directors wouldn’t dream of making late-night forays down back ...
Aug 27, 2017 | by Brian Burton | from Lexpert Magazine July/August 2017 Issue
IN STARK COUNTERPOINT to the predilections of the current US president — who makes great use of Twitter as a medium — the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) say their reality more or less excludes social media. To be fair, the CSA has its own Twitter account and explicitly ...
Apr 12, 2018 | by Lexpert Staff | from 2018 Canadian Lexpert Directory
Complicating Securities Class Actions According to the Bennett Jones Class Action Litigation Group: “In 2016, significant decisions were rendered in class proceedings that provide clarity on how Canadian courts intend to interact with each other, domestic and foreign litigants, and courts ...