Jason J. Annibale

Jason J. Annibale

Partner at McMillan LLP
(416) 865-7912
(416) 865-7048
181 Bay St, Suite 4400, Brookfield Pl, Bay Wellington Twr, Toronto, ON
Year called to bar: 2002
Jason J. Annibale is McMillan's national co-chairman, construction and a partner in the firm’s advocacy and dispute resolution group. He acts on complex construction disputes and transactions, particularly within the P3 space. A key aspect of her practice involves resolving delay and cost overrun disputes, particularly in the context of COVID-19 impacts. He is a fellow of both the Canadian College of Construction Lawyers and the Construction Lawyers Society of America. He has been recognized by Chambers Canada and the Best Lawyers in Canada as a leading lawyer in construction law. He has also been recognized by the Lexpert/Report on Business as one of Canada’s leading infrastructure lawyers. He was elected to the Ontario Bar Association's construction and infrastructure law section executive for three terms and is the author of the chapter on dispute resolution in the Lexis/Nexis text, Public-Private Partnerships in Canada: Law Policy and Value for Money. He regularly speaks and writes in the construction community and is co-chairman for Osgoode Hall’s premier construction programs, including the full-week Construction Law Certificate program, the Construction Liens program, the Ontario Construction Act program, and the Construction Delay and Impact Claims program.
Jason J. Annibale is a featured Leading Lawyer in:
Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory
Consistently Recommended
Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory
Repeatedly Recommended
Jason J. Annibale is also listed in the following publication(s)
Read more about Jason J. Annibale in ...
Government priorities – Ottawa looks to green and clean, provinces focus on public transit and roads
Finding a way to achieve all these infrastructure objectives is key, say lawyers
Duty of good faith in common law of contract prevalent in infrastructure construction disputes
Recent Supreme Court of Canada case law has developed the doctrine