By the end of 2025, the Canada Infrastructure Bank had committed more than $18 billion across about 108 projects, with roughly $28 billion of its original $35 billion capital envelope already spoken for, a trajectory that chief legal and information officer Frédéric Duguay says has pushed Ottawa to raise that envelope to $45 billion so the institution can keep backing housing‑enabling infrastructure, trade corridors, clean power and AI‑related systems while avoiding an artificial cap on new deals.
He frames that shift less as a windfall than as a response to the pace the CIB has already set, noting that over roughly the past five years it has been committing between $3 billion and $5 billion a year to about 20 to 30 projects, and warning that without a larger envelope the bank would soon be forced to turn away commercially sound projects that fit its mandate to encourage private capital in public‑interest infrastructure.
Housing is the most visible front and, in his view, the most misunderstood, because the Canada Infrastructure Bank is not financing homes but the foundations that make them buildable, with capital going into what he calls enabling infrastructure. "It’s the roads, it’s the district energy system, it’s the broadband, it’s essentially the site preparation that is needed to enable more development," so municipalities and developers can build at scale without carrying all the early‑stage risk, he says. That approach is meant to close what he describes as a development gap, where it is financially rational to underbuild infrastructure even as governments demand more housing, while a separate Crown corporation, Build Canada Homes, focuses on how units are actually delivered.
Indigenous communities are the second pillar of where he wants the expanded envelope to land, and Duguay points to the Indigenous Community Infrastructure Initiative, launched in 2021 with a $1 billion target for projects that benefit Indigenous communities or are built with them, alongside the Indigenous Equity Initiative, which offers loans so communities can buy equity stakes in CIB‑backed projects. He says those programs have already supported more than 33 projects across the country and pushed the target from $1 billion to $3 billion, with the aim of improving access to capital and shifting the conversation “from benefits to ownership,” rather than leaving Indigenous partners on the margins of major developments.
Clean power now accounts for the majority of the CIB’s portfolio as it pursues decarbonization and energy security with provinces, and Duguay highlights the first electricity link between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, where the CIB and Mi'kmaq communities on both sides are investors and where the financing helps preserve more than $200 million in benefits for Nova Scotia ratepayers. This project serves as a model for how the CIB’s capital can simultaneously support renewables, Indigenous ownership, and affordability, he says.
On trade, Duguay calls it "a huge focus" as the federal government works to build "one Canadian economy" that grows exports and reduces reliance on a single trading partner. He links the CIB’s work with the Major Projects Office (MPO) to projects at ports, railways, airports, logistics hubs, and in critical minerals, casting them as part of an effort to move files faster to final investment decision so that supply chain weaknesses are addressed before they become permanent drags on productivity. In addition to the projects referred to the MPO, he points to support for Montréal Trudeau International Airport’s renewal plan, the new Montreal Metropolitan Airport, and the Thompson Regional Airport in Manitoba, as investments under the transportation and trade-enabling infrastructure priority.
Duguay explains that the CIB is extending its long‑standing broadband priority into a broader push on what he calls AI and digital infrastructure, which he describes as "foundational drivers of global economic competitiveness." Since 2019, the CIB has been investing to close broadband gaps in rural and remote communities and is now looking at large‑scale opportunities such as data centres and the associated grid capacity and on‑site clean energy they will require, while working with Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to ensure prospective AI infrastructure investments align with the federal AI strategy.
Those goals sit under what he calls "increasing public and parliamentary scrutiny," and Duguay emphasizes that, as a steward of public funds, the CIB must demonstrate prudence, transparency and a path to self‑sustainability rather than permanent reliance on new appropriations. He points to its public transparency framework and public impact management policy, which set out what is disclosed at financial close for each project – from the size and structure of the CIB’s investment to the expected public impacts – and how those impacts are tracked through annual reports and other disclosures on its website.
For private-sector clients and their lawyers, Duguay says his team spends a lot of time with stakeholders who aim to advance a project and are unsure whether the Canada Infrastructure Bank, which provides loans or equity, or a grant-making agency or another federal program, is the most appropriate instrument to close the project’s financial gap. He says the CIB will steer proponents elsewhere when that is the honest answer rather than drag them through a misaligned process, because the point of the expanded envelope is to keep scarce public capital focused on projects that genuinely fit its mandate.
"We really try to take a whole of Canada approach to advancing these projects," Duguay says, arguing that the Canada Infrastructure Bank, the Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program, Build Canada Homes and other entities are not rivals but complementary tools.
This article is based on an episode of CL Talk, which can also be found here:
The episode can also be found on our CL Talk podcast homepage, which includes links to follow CL Talk on all the major podcast providers.
