Diversity in legal departments is not just a talking point at conferences. It shows up in pay gaps, promotion rates, and hiring numbers you can actually check. This brief walks through what the data says, what general counsel (GC) are doing about it, and where they still fall short.
What the data on diversity in legal departments actually shows
Starting with pay, the Women Lawyers Forum’s 2021 pay equity report of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA) cites a 2020 survey of Canadian in-house counsel showing women earn 11 percent less than men in the same roles. The gap widens at senior levels: 30 percent of male in-house counsel earned over $200,000 a year, compared with 19 percent of women.
Advancement follows the same pattern. A 2021 survey by the Law Society of Saskatchewan (LSA) found:
- 57 percent of equity-seeking members struggled to advance at the same pace as colleagues with similar experience, compared with 17 percent of non-equity-seeking members
- 43 percent struggled to build mentorship relationships, compared with 13 percent of non-equity-seeking members
- 48 percent of all respondents identified as part of an equity-seeking group
Priority is moving the wrong way too. The Canadian Corporate Counsel Association (CCCA) and Mondaq’s 2025 Canadian In-House Counsel Report found 39 percent of Canadian legal departments did not consider equality, diversity and inclusion a priority. Not every figure points backward: the 2023 report of the Law Society of British Columbia (LSBC) shows the share of lawyers from equity-deserving groups has grown since its Diversity Action Plan took effect in 2020.
Head over to Lexpert’s In-House Lawyer page for more news dedicated for in-house lawyers and general counsel.
Where GCs and CLOs are putting their effort, where they aren’t
In Ontario, this stops being optional once a workplace reaches a certain size. The Law Society of Ontario’s (LSO) equality, diversity and inclusion FAQ states that any legal workplace or department with 10 or more licensees, including an in-house department, must have a Human Rights and Diversity Policy covering fair recruitment, retention and advancement. Where an employer has no compliant policy, the obligation falls on the individual licensee.
The LSBC 2023 report has moved further, structurally:
- mandatory Indigenous intercultural competence training for all practising lawyers, introduced in 2022
- revised return-to-practice rules in 2023, easing the disadvantage faced by lawyers, mostly women, who take time away to raise children
- diversity criteria added to Bencher nominations and Tribunal appointments
Internally, diversity still competes poorly for attention. The 2026 Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) Chief Legal Officers Survey found only 9 percent of chief legal officers (CLOs) named diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives as part of their talent retention strategy, against 58 percent offering flexible work and 51 percent focused on wellbeing. The same survey found budget and resources was the top barrier to success, cited by 35 percent of respondents.
Using outside counsel selection as a diversity lever
Canadian GCs already have a lever for shaping this outcome beyond their own team: who gets hired outside the building. The CBA Women Lawyers Forum found that in-house counsel who seek out diverse lawyers at outside firms, and tell those firms directly when they notice a lack of diversity, can shift how work gets allocated.
Legal departments already practice values-based vetting, just not usually for diversity. The 2026 ACC Chief Legal Officers Survey found:
- 13 percent of organizations worldwide changed how they evaluate outside counsel because of political developments
- 41 percent of those who changed added new risk categories, such as vetting a firm’s public statements
- 37 percent stopped working with specific firms over concerns about their public profile
The same infrastructure, criteria, scorecards, formal review, could carry a diversity question just as easily. The mechanism for building it into outside counsel selection already exists.
Benchmarking your department against your peers
Benchmarking diversity in legal departments starts with data that already exists, even where it is hard to find. The LSO is building an inclusion index combining workplace self-assessments, lawyer self-identification data and inclusion survey answers, but only workplaces with 25 or more licensees receive an individualized report. Smaller departments rely on the profession-wide statistical snapshot the regulator has published every year since 2009.
Size shapes what counts as a fair comparison. The 2026 ACC Chief Legal Officers Survey found most chief legal officers surveyed lead departments with fewer than 10 legal staff, and 19 percent named talent and staffing as their single greatest barrier to success. A small in-house team measuring itself against a large corporate legal department’s diversity numbers is not comparing like with like.
The clearest starting point is still profession-wide data. LSBC’s 2023 report shows the share of lawyers from equity-deserving groups has climbed since its Diversity Action Plan began in 2020, giving every legal department, regardless of size, a fixed point to measure against.
Subscribe to the free Lexpert newsletter for more articles to help general counsel and in-house lawyers, including topics about diversity in legal departments.